"Training is expensive," a much-heard argument and true! Short-term thinking saves money train. Eventually, however, does not do this, the existence of Salons rely on employees, so no single fighter in the form of one-person companies are. Highly qualified young talent is necessary for survival. If a contractor does not educate, it can not and should not demand for labor, if he needs any. It is to save as in: who pays nothing, gets nothing back. It forms no property, and there is no interest. This reality can understand everyone. Oddly enough, sees a large number of hairdressers this need in training, although the issue remains on the table. Not the forming faces the problem of Falschausbildens. If fifty percent of the trainees leave the profession because it for the level of their qualifications are not any posts, must the trainer can ask why they employ it at all trainees. You will probably be used primarily as subcontractors, which incidentally reduces staffing factor. Though the low factor is positive, provided, however, the trainees are designed so that they operate independently from the second year of training customers to help enhance the value of the company. If it is generated with low staff turnover factor anymore, it's very good. It may be imputed consistent, trainees should be included as non-productive forces in the planning, but just so you aim at solving the nuclear problem, the productive Use of trainees over.
We believe in the future of education. Us, it is basically whether to a master craftsman is necessary or not. We believe that every young person has a skill that they can inform other students. To promote these talents and use them for the good of the enterprise, is our duty as entrepreneurs. For this we have to question in principle, as we see our company: training objectives must be clearly outlined the steps of development of the company and the parameters must be set.
www.gress.de
0 comments:
Post a Comment